In the state of Iowa alone, the total economic loss was estimated at USD 1.2 billion. The epornitic spread to 21 states and led to the loss of over 50 million poultry.

The 2014–2015 HPAI epornitic had a devastating effect on the US poultry industry, particularly in the Midwest. Collectively, the study observations indicate that AIV survivability in feed is relatively low, thus rendering it a low risk. Furthermore, the thermal degradation of AIV suggests that the heat treatment of feeds could be an alternative to chemical treatment when contamination is suspected.

A significant decay in the viral RNA over time was noted at 37 ☌ ( p < 0.05), suggesting that feedstuffs should be maintained in the cold chain when testing is desired. The half-life of AIV RNA was shorter at a higher temperature. In the spiked feeds, the AIV titer was 1–3 logs lower than that in the corresponding media, even when tested immediately after spiking, suggesting that feed might have a negative impact on the virus or PCR detection. Some of the feedstuffs collected from the poultry facilities or feed mills were positive for AIV RNA but negative by the virus isolation (VI) test, while all the formaldehyde-treated feedstuffs were PCR-negative. The spiked feed and media samples were tested by a multiplex real-time RT–PCR ran in a quantitative manner, either immediately or after incubation at −20, 4, 22, and 37 ☌ for 24, 48, and 72 h. Virus-spiked cell culture media were prepared in the same manner and used for comparison. Secondly, feed materials obtained from an AIV-negative farm were spiked with various concentrations of a low pathogenic AIV H5N2. Firstly, feed samples were collected from commercial poultry facilities that experienced highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N2) in 2014–2015 for AIV testing by a real-time RT–PCR specific for the viral matrix gene. The present study was conducted to assess the potential vector role of feedstuffs for the area spreading of avian influenza virus (AIV).

What is a feed reader